Witness Gets Emotional While Retelling His Bigfoot Encounter
One thing often overlooked is the psychological impact a bigfoot sighting can have on a person. In this video, a man talks about his encounter with a bigfoot, and becomes clearly emotional while he remembers the events of that night.
Always liked this account.
ReplyDeleteDUDE....
DeleteThe big guy wanted him gone. The guy was lucky he didn't shlt his pants. They know that all it takes is a look. They truly are the rulers of their domain
DeleteMMC
lots of folk running into BIGFOOT but dont come back, BIGFOOTs dont like trespassers!
DeleteHuh, that guy could be my little brother. Kinda looks like me. And you do kinda just go into overload------ WTF am I looking at?????
DeleteI wish I would have had a gun when I got screamed at. But, my and my hunting partner only had a camera and not thinking Bigfoot at the time, freaking ran 300 Yds back to the truck. Sounded like a cross between a lion and a woman and loud as a bull elephant.
Lake Texoma, Hagerman wildlife area, Sept, 1984, if your wondering.
DeleteHe buddy! Got your second email, expect an email back soon!
Deletesure we had a kid named Jack, we kids would go out in the woods back in the day with 22s and play WAR GAMEs !!! What a rush that was.....
ReplyDeleteBUT no BIGFOOT found !!!!
i grabbed my stick an i ruff talked him an run him off. i says GIT AWAY FRUM HEER! GIT! GIT! and he went back down that path
ReplyDeletehe had beeutiful hair
lol I remember that bigfoot story, hilarious.
DeleteMoonshine does tend to make some people emotional.
ReplyDeleteCasts can be explained by wooden stompers / bear tracks.
ReplyDeleteSightings can be explained by psychological predisposition.
Films can be explained by suits.
Is there anything that can't be explained without the need for an apeman?
^Yes, the only thing can't be explained without an apeman is your brilliant narrow-mindness.
DeleteCasts don't explain dermal ridges found in the actual impressions. Bear tracks are dual trackways and leave claw marks.
DeletePsychological predisposition does not explain ten thousand years of native culture that didn't know what an ape looked like, and does not explain instances of multiple eyewitnesses.
Got monkey suit?
Dermal ridges are artifacts of the casting process. Meldrum even got caught out on this when asked why 2 subsequent tracks from the same trackway had different dermal ridges.
DeleteThere is 10,000 years of native culture for many mythical animals, you should probably read up on that before you make yourself look any more stupid.
Multiple eyewitnesses is also covered by another psychological phenomenon.
Oh and that doesnt even matter of course because eye witness accounts are not valid forms of evidence.
Face it. You got nothing kid.
Half way down this page;
Deletehttp://bigfootforums.com/index.php?/topic/32050-dermal-ridges-or-casting-artifact/
... Dermals in the impression. And half way down here;
http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/36334-suit-possibly-key-to-final-hoax-proof/page-5
... A comparison of casting artifacts and actual dermals. Elk Wallow casts are dissimilar to the wrinkle foot casts which is what many including Meldrum have been scrutinised over. Artificial desiccation has it's own uniform style that does not match one school of alleged Sasquatch traits. My emphasis of dermal ridges is on the morphology of the three Elk Wallow track casts, which show the greatest detail, especially in terms of the pattern of dermal ridges that was OBSERVED IN THE ACTUAL TRACKS, and that has been preserved in parts of the plaster casts.
There are also eagles, bears, beavers, all these things are in native myth and legend too... But the difference about the sensational creatures you can list don't have physical and biological evidence to support.
And no... Psychological phenomena does not explain instances of multiple eyewitnesses, as most witnesses are not only sceptical and impartial, but account for police officers who are trained with observance of detail. Unfortunately for you, the judiciary system is the standard to which eyewitnesses are valid and when you have physical and biological evidence to support that; game changer son.
The only nothing is between those ears of yours.
; )
Oh, and by the way... Meldrum allegedly being caught out could quite easily have been the result of a casting artifact as well as an authentic dermal being attained in the same trackway.
DeleteNo, no... The pleasure's all mine.
Again. Dancing around the issues and ending with a self reassuring smiley face. What a silly man.
DeleteJoe got skookumed.
DeleteHa ha ha?! I've addressed every one of your issues, but like a good little 'psuedosciencer', when you can't explain something away you deny there's anything to explain... It's quite a spectacle in psychology to see you people in practice.
DeleteI need not reassure myself, your fumblings do that rather nicely for me.
: p
You can "explain" issues with as many words as you want but it doesnt help your cause. Merely offering a possible explanation doesn't prove anything. The very fact that you have to resort to such underhand tactics shows that you have nothing of merit to bring to the table.
DeleteYou've addressed them in your usual try and bury it with tons of garbage tactic.
DeleteDoes it ever bother you that your brilliance always fails to convince anyone of anything?
Cept you're a numbskull, you're a turd, etc, etc.
Trying to explain away the points posed to you would most certainly help yours though, and should you not accomplish that, then it looks like I've got the better claim to being right; this is how adult debate works son. Offering a possible explanation that has supporting evidence that you cannot counter with nothing but mere cynicism, doesn't help your cause either. My 'underhand tactics' are in fact your failures kiddo, I have everything I stand by... And some of those things being dermals and ten thoudand years of cultural and contemporary anecdotes, didn't you just notice?
Delete2:58... I'm not trying to convince a perverse denialist such as yourself, just enjoying showing everyone else how little you know.
Delete: )
Isn't it sad that you have to fight like a cornered rat over dermal ridges?
DeleteAll it would take is one good chunk of evidence and this thing would get blown wide open.
But that never happens, does it? Day in, day out, month after month after year after year...
Cornered? I'm still waiting on a countering argument son? There's plenty of good evidence, consisting of every form short of modern type specimen in fact, but it's not in your nature to agknowledge it let alone understand it. The days go by, months, etc, and we get closer all the time to getting the attention of the best scientists in the world asking the questions, moving us away from the dogma and persuing the answers that a collective effort would have secured a long time ago.
DeleteNo; the state of evidence for bigfoot is so alarmingly bad that you have to scratch and claw for acceptance for the creature based on such horrible things as casts of tracks. That's gotta suck.
DeleteWhen wildlife biologists conduct much of their research on the tracks of their subjects of study, then it's pretty much as horrible as what we've come to know as tried and tested methods of research, dear boy... Which isn't very horrible at all in fact. The "state of evidence" is in fact impressive enough to get the best primatologists in the world to take note... You and your anonymous, insignificant opinion wouldn't know better than them now, would you?
DeleteAnyway... Now I'm bored. I'll be back to answer any vomits in the morning.
DeleteNighty, night sweetheart.
2 footers died and are waiting at the pearly gates. God says you have 1 question. One of the footers asks is bigfoot real? God says no. The footer turns to the other and says bigfoot is even more elusive and intelligent than we thought.
ReplyDeleteI think Anonymous has really hit the nail on the head here. It is the die hard believers that exhibit a narrow-mindedness not often seen in the 21st century outside of certain fundamentalist religions.
DeleteWe could pave all of the land flat and map every square inch of it by satellite, and then listen to them explain how bigfoot has gone back to the oceans.how bigfoot has gone
Not believing in Bigfoot is fine, not recognising consistent science and then rhetorically demanding enthusiasts present proof you're only gonna scoff at, a tactic you folk have mastered, is cult-like and as fundementalist as your comment tries to portray anyone else as. There is nothing more fundementalist than people who not only don't understand consistent scientific method, but those that desocrate, interpret the true meaning of scepticism and it's application to denounce tens of thousands who have had impartial and unprovoked experiences that, which in turn have undeniable physical and biological evidence to support.
DeletePseudoskepticism is a fundamentalist quasi-religion.
Oh, you mean the sience that says bigfoot is not a real creature? Is that the science we're talking about? You know, the one they teach in all of the schools and universities...just want to be sure here. You seem to have this bizarre worldview where bigfoot is real because of science.
DeleteTwo sceptic extremists die together, then pose pompously hand-in-hand at the Pearly Gates. God says, "You may ask one question." SE 1 says "No, I don't need to ask you anything; I'll just tell you something, I don't bleeve you exist. I need proof. Real solid proof. You could just be a bloke in a God suit." SE 1 snapped his soft sausage fingers in God's face and stuck his tongue out at him.
DeleteGod points his finger at SE 1 . . . ZAP! SE 1 disappears, leaving a pathetic swirl of smoke behind, 'nothing more than' a cosmic fart.
SE 2 witnesses this. He looks at God. He says, "I need more evidence for your existence than that. I require real solid for-real proof, like real science. I luv science. How do I know I am not simply experiencing some psychological phenomena with your trick finger and my dematerialising companion?" SE 2 pointed jeeringly at God, and did a little pontificating dance with his plump pampered feet. He was deeply pleased with himself.
ZAP! Nothing remained of SE 2 but a tiny bubble which burst with an inconsequential burp.
The few sceptic extremists who had managed to get in line behind SE 1 and SE 2, scoffed and snorted at the spectacle. They strutted this way and that, shouting at God that the supernatural does not exist. "Supernatural, my a**!" cried one especially noxious obnoxious sceptic extremist.
God hollered down the line, "Now I have a question for you! Just who is the omniscient one here, you lot, or me?"
3:16... You must be confused. Science doesn't say anything, it doesn't hold opinions or is freethinking for that matter, it's in fact a tool and it's been used to identify evidence that points to an unknown primate residing in the wilderness of the U.S.
DeleteYour version of 'science' is something I can make look stupid in a flash.
Resident butthurt footer and poster boy for footer stupidity detected @ 3:20
DeleteHe schooled you rather spectacularly.
DeletePossibly. Who reads that garbage?
DeleteUsually enthusiasts who are way more impartial than anyone else.
DeleteBoth Joe and 3:20 ripped this skeptards head off and crapped down his neck. As the Skeptard is choking on a turd, "I am still right !"
DeleteYou can't fix stupid!
This guy does even come close to Dr. Johnson crying when he recounts his Bigfoot encounter
ReplyDeleteHe also needs to work on his sleeve length.
DeleteHIs wee man boobs are budding though.
DeleteAt this point bigfoot is about as convincing as the Noah's ark story and that's being generous.
ReplyDeleteThere are over 320 like stories from civilizations around the planet of a world-wide flood. Other linguists say it's over 1000 when you count a lot of the smaller tribes of indegenous peoples.
DeleteThe scientist who came up with the theory of stratification said it could have only happened from LIQUID!!!
Seashells in the strata with indiginous critters on every major mountain range on the planet!
Whale graveyards in deserts all around the world!
God has left you clues all over the world, but some are just too freakin stupid or blind.
(tard)But God, But God --------- I didn't know.
(God)--Yes you did, the guy on BFE told you I'm sure.
(tard) --- But I didn't believe him!
(God) I've left you signs all over the planet and universe that tells you, I built this place specifically for mankind! There is no more excusses, especially being a stubborn idiot!
(tard) but i never saw you!
(God) you never looked, you never asked. All you did was disspize me and my followers. I have a question for you, "Do you have to see a skunk to know he is there?"
(tard) No!
(God) me either, so long there smokey. Wish I could say it's been nice knowing you, ------ but if I had, you wouldn't be leaving for hell now!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yo3quMMp24U
Delete10/4 DS. TK.
DeleteBigfoot Found! On Mars! Scientists cite methane belches as 'unmistakable signature of sasquatch'.
ReplyDelete