Rictor "the gay one" Rolo say's "do you want some candy little boy?" My GOD always watch your children around them gays! they are not right in the head!
Please don't lump all gays together with this joke! some of us are are trustworthy productive dynamic people, and its obvious by the sentence structure that this was posted by the former Robert Lindsey quote idiot which I thought had already been addressed I know these are your attempts at humor but please know as you read these "quotes" to yourself that others just view them as awkward
Personally? No, no, no, it appears the confusion is with you sir, "talking smack" comes very natural to me, it's a side I have no qualms in expressing when someone claims a subject that has scientific stock is a mere religion. Apologies if I came across too keen.
"The evidence is not there because scientists who have not studied it say it isn't... Also the evidence does not exist because Sasquatch doesn't exist." -Daniel Pseudo-Campbell
4:28... I deleted it cause you came across like a nice guy. I made my point about the religion remark and thought I'd cause no further offence.
Two items were proved by Justin Sejgma or whatever his name is. One he's an absolute fabricator of fact. Two he is a Real live out of the truck beside a county road, no regard for life of anything, male female, young or old, and especially others that obey the law and respect nature,,, POACHER!. Nothing worse exists on a over used over populated world. A man without ethics with a weapon. That was the argument against Saddam wasn't it?
No D Dover he actually Failed his lie detector, Miserably. Then he brought in a piece of the bear he poached, as the proof of his Kill. Failed all possible ways meant to prove his story, Failed everything accept that he is a poacher, he proved that one point.
Your right, anon 11:36, Justin failed the test. I do believe he shot something, A bear, where the BF story came from?? His story matches that of a true poacher, even his choice of weapons reeks non ethical poacher. I can't believe he is making money and considered anything other than a good for nothing poacher. I say nothing, I wouldn't say directly to his face. TC
No 11:36... You silly little disinformationist, he passed a lie detector's test.
"This is exactly what happened during the documentary about the Sykes study where Justin Smeja was interviewed about his claim to have shot and killed at least one bigfoot. It was well known within the community that Justin submitted a tissue sample to Sykes that was believed to be that of a bear. This was known information before hand. Yet when the documentary was released, it was edited to make it sound like Smeja claimed to have acquired the tissue sample directly from the bigfoot itself. This was not only misleading, it was an outright lie. Regardless of how you feel about Smeja, or what your opinion is on his claim, he was in fact misrepresented and lied about during this documentary. That is a fact." - Matt K
11:40... The fool is he spending his time around something that so seemingly causes nothing but negativity in him. The only "role player" is you, trying to play the role of "confident sceptic"... When you're here, having to reinforce your level of child like, boogeyman reassurance. Rich someone like you should comment on anyone else's life.
I'n not a skeptic, I tend to give everyone the benefit of a doubt. I believe he shot a bear, I believe the test, I believe the tears of absolute proof of fraud he cried. If he knew this was a set up, why did he allow himself to be part of it. If your heart tells you to believe Justin killed a BF, believe him. His statements let me and every law abiding hunter know, he's a poacher. I've never heard anything to the contrary about his hunting ethics, have you? That's my problem with Justin. Others can debate why anyone would kill anything and leave it laying. Poachers do that regularly. Hunters don't. TC
He thing is TC, I am not residing in a country where hunting is a major part of my culture, I am naive to the sport and if I'm honest don't like the thought of shooting bears and mountain lion... But this is why I am not so offended with him allegedly poaching, ourely because I don't understand it all...
But believe he is saying the truth, and it is the affiliation of people like Bart Cutino that has swayed me more than anything. Your opinion is respected, and even if he did do what he said he did, I find it appalling... But my gut feeling points to it being the truth. The one thing I don't like about it all is people posting deliverately wrong information, I understand I have as much a claim to the actual truth as anyone else.
Iktomi, Even in disagreement, you treat me with nothing but respect my friend. I have and opinion of the man for which his statements make me confident. You have much more info about what he might have actually killed and what he has encountered with the skeptics. My problem is completely with the man's actions my friend. I wasn't there to see what he used a 25 caliber weapon while standing by a road after driving around searching for something to shoot at. That's my complete problem with my admitted unethical Justin. 0= NO problems at all with my well informed friend IKTOMI, your friend and supporter, TC
Actually TC, your comment at 11:58 has helped me better understand the distinction betwrmine hunting and poaching, and I can very much see why you would be offended by that.
Listen TC, I rely on good, honest people like yourself to educate me of your ways over there. Very, very often, when you post it is a complete education and you along with a select few of new comers have really made the blog a far better place.
Anon 12:04, walk in to a Game officer or a sheriff's office, and admit, You were using a truck, to look for game on public hunting land. You shot anything from that truck or from the road, then you left your kill. You will be prosecuted based on your admission of guilt for several infractions. If you claim you killed a BF, what will happen? Plus you have no proof. The admitted act is the infraction, no matter what you say you killed. HIS BIG MOUTH and appearances story telling to the public and signing his statement, that's all that's needed to prosecute a poacher around here. Should be that way everywhere. TC
Food for thought TC., In this state, when your feet hit the ground, your OK.
Second, Justin regularly hunted (heard thinning) for the local game authority. From what I remember, he was tagged up for bear, and the only issue was one side of the road or other ------
And finally, Dude, when you see something like like this -------- you short the hell out, you cannot say you would be rational until you've been exactly in his shoes.
It was far from Ideal and Justin has admitted it and feels bad, but he is also heard so much of the murder crap, he's like "aw screw it, I'll get another to shut people up!"
I just ask that you cut him a little slack, He knows it wasn't good. But again MONSTER!
But hey, your your own man too!
Hey Iktomi ----- did you read that Dan can Lick his own ass! ha ha ha
Iktomi, people trying to figure out the BF story aren't the problem my friend. I can't imagine why Justin hasn't been jerked in by his ears. We have a little wildlife officer around hear named Brent. He used this and a couple other stories to make the distinction between hearsay evidence and admitted evidence usable to prosecute. Here, Justin would have a much smaller bank account, and would be famous for a totally different reason. We have a healthy wildlife population, and a very serious view of those that disrespect it my friend. I can't say what he killed, but shooting at anything in that matter,even if he missed, is a serious offense IKTOMI. Your doing well as usual friend. TC
I see... That's a very interesting comment. I can't communicate to you enough how much I enjoy your comments, you understand instantly that you are exchanging with someone very experienced and very intelligent... I think anyone will agree.
TC, I saw something that could very well have been a BF, I had a Glc 40cal, loaded to the hilt and three extra clips. I didn't even attempt to get a shot. I've never heard of anyone using the excuse of, I freaked out, and getting a pass. What herd was he licensed and thinning? He said they were driving around looking for bear, then if you believe him, he thinned a BF herd. No excuse will work my friend. Licensed hunters are the only official herd thinners, if animal population become to high, the state allows higher bag limits, and extra long seasons. That's a blanket statement for everywhere TK. State don't loose the chance to make money on extra kill tags by allowing a few guys to go out and kill without discretion. Hunting provides huge amounts of monies to each state. I've never heard of any animals in a herd being individually thinned. We can all be misled from time to time. TC
Well TC, Itkomi, TK, Chick. There are some outstanding researchers that have been involved with Smeja that believe him and they have tried on numerous occassions to trip him up and spy on his conversations, to find out if he is lying. He had a bear tag so he was not poaching if he did shoot a bear. He did pass a lie detector test and it was reported here first back in 2012 I believe.
Now everything about the whole matter is reprehensible to me and if in fact he pulled the trigger on the adult and even worse the kid to me that is murder. Itkomi was absoulutely correct in that they new it was bear that was being tested, it had already been tested as bear at another US lab. Icon films had an agenda to try and make bigfooters look like fools. If he shot and left the young one another bigfoot family member would have taken the body for whatever ceremony they use. Anyway that is my take, no better or worse than anyone elses in this messed up matter. Chuck
I find just about everything about this reprehensible, and if indeed he shot an adult and killed a kid bigfoot, to me this is murder. Iktomi is correct he passed the lie detector in Oct. of 2012 I think and it was reported on a daily basis. He had a bear tag so he would not be poaching a bear. There are some really good and reputable researchers that have been involved with him that have tried hard to vet him and trip him up and even spy on his private conversations to find if he was lying. They believe him.
My whole opinion is it sucks and it sucks bad. Chuck
Chuck, my man, I two agree about all you said, except the test shown on tv, he failed that one. I'm convinced he shot something. I've seen these kinda people in action, his story makes sense from a poacher's kill anything that moves perspective. I despise that way of thinking. How does a person conceive of killing the young of any species? They did it or have done it in the recent past, that's how. I believe he destroyed something absolutely, and just the way he said, why not a huge creature bogged down with the responsibility of caring for young. Bear, BF, hell, cow and calf, dog with pups, whatever, killing for the love of killing is just that, I'm not concerned with what he shot, my concern is with the shooter being glorified of this terrible crime against nature. Tri-county.
Damn straight TC, he's a cowardly scoundrel. I don't care who decides to rub shoulders with him. I believe he killed a couple of bears, thought he was heard or discovered, and claimed bf. People that know a body is needed often use that fact as a reason for kill instead of video or research. He no hero of mine either.
If Smegma "thought" he was heard or discovered that he had poached some bears, why come out a few months later and claim Bigfoot? He would of been busted when he was coming down from said "site".Your thinking is ILLOGICAL 4:18.
6:16... He went straight on to a hunting forum as he was deeply troubled by hi actions in reflection, and posted that he had shot some "strange bears", or words to that effect. He was then coaxed by a well known researcher (I forget his name, sorry), for many weeks before he decided to go back to the kill site, to which time there were feet of snow on the ground and the dogs he took were trained to find bear.
Nobody should listen to or support Riolo in ANY WAY. Not since he showed his true colors by siding with insane hoaxer Rick Dyer. Go to his youtube show and see for your self, it's sickening. I couldn't even make it through the first episode.
That's letting Rictor off too easy. Point is he has a LOUD voice in the community, be he an entertainer or not. And he gave a platform to one of the biggest cancer's the community has ever seen. And all that will do is encourage the cancer to keep coming back. So thanks Rictor, thanks a whole freaking lot Mr Entertainment. You've done no favors to anyone that actually tries to take this subject seriously with your Rick Dyer stunt show. Thanks a whole f-ing lot.
entertainer at a gay bar or a ru-paul knock off show! Entertainer is the biggest bullshit I have heard in a while. entertainer pfft! You joking right rictor? oh that's right maybe he's doing stand up in L.A. now too!
The "lol" poster from 1:35 is just proving the point. It's impossible for the people who take this seriously to BE taken seriously, all because of stuff like that. Why are you even on a Bigfoot board?
2:46 You know its ALL make believe. You just want certain people playing and others not. You want your play to be respectable and within the realm of the possible. However, you're lower in the "bigfoot community" than a hoaxer. Hoaxers are entertaining and created the whole industry.
By the way..smegma not only shot from the road he did it at night..unless you are a tribal member that method is illegal as hell..and any outdoorsman with any honor or skill would never do...he's just a piece of garbage...also there's a reason lie detector tests aren't admissible in court
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Very hot and turdy
ReplyDeleteSteamy with the odor of too much sharp cheeze
DeleteHarrison Ford crashed his plane after suffering engine failure,rumour has it Chewbacca's hair got caught up in the propeller :) xx
DeleteHi eva
DeleteHe's gonna have to fix the divit
MMC
Rictor "the gay one" Rolo say's "do you want some candy little boy?" My GOD always watch your children around them gays! they are not right in the head!
DeleteI don't take candy from anyone! Except the superfriends.
DeletePlease don't lump all gays together with this joke! some of us are are trustworthy productive dynamic people, and its obvious by the sentence structure that this was posted by the former Robert Lindsey quote idiot which I thought had already been addressed I know these are your attempts at humor but please know as you read these "quotes" to yourself that others just view them as awkward
Delete"queer" ^
DeleteEVA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteHello MMC and BigfootStudent xx
DeleteHey BS!!!
DeleteHey up there guys!
DeleteBoooooommmmm! Chick in the house!!
DeleteRectum Riolo and Justa Sludgepot. Wow!
ReplyDeleteI made it as far as 3:41 before I couldn't take it anymore. I'm thinking that's some kind of record.
ReplyDeleteIt's only a minute long. You're an idiot.
DeletePart 1 isn't, genius.
DeleteUtterly disgusting, laughing at the murder of a female and possibly both children. Can't believe they're still milking that event.
ReplyDeleteYou do understand that Justin made up that story. Right?
DeleteOr are you so far gone that you believe him?
*sheds a tear for the tree hugging butthurt footer*
DeleteJesus who needs more of this bullshit.
ReplyDeleteFooters do. It is their religion.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteLOL I follow this blog for laughs. I would never want to censor you Joe.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteUmm you have me confused with someone else.
DeleteI want this blog to flourish. It provides me with some laughter almost daily.
Sure I talk smack. Who doesn't here? You seem to take this way to personal Joe.
Personally? No, no, no, it appears the confusion is with you sir, "talking smack" comes very natural to me, it's a side I have no qualms in expressing when someone claims a subject that has scientific stock is a mere religion. Apologies if I came across too keen.
Delete*pseudoscientific stock
Deletewhy did you delete your comments Joe?
DeleteI find that very interesting.
"The evidence is not there because scientists who have not studied it say it isn't... Also the evidence does not exist because Sasquatch doesn't exist."
Delete-Daniel Pseudo-Campbell
4:28... I deleted it cause you came across like a nice guy. I made my point about the religion remark and thought I'd cause no further offence.
Justin Smeja "Bigfoot Kill" location WHAT THE!!!
ReplyDeleteIT NEVER HAPPENED SOCIOPATHIC BULL CRAP!!
Calm down there Tex.
DeleteTwo items were proved by Justin Sejgma or whatever his name is. One he's an absolute fabricator of fact. Two he is a Real live out of the truck beside a county road, no regard for life of anything, male female, young or old, and especially others that obey the law and respect nature,,, POACHER!. Nothing worse exists on a over used over populated world. A man without ethics with a weapon. That was the argument against Saddam wasn't it?
ReplyDeleteSmeja = Saddam, Interesting analogy. He passed a lie detector test.
DeleteIf he did shoot something the idiot should have collected something then.
No D Dover he actually Failed his lie detector, Miserably. Then he brought in a piece of the bear he poached, as the proof of his Kill. Failed all possible ways meant to prove his story, Failed everything accept that he is a poacher, he proved that one point.
DeleteIf.....
DeleteIf's and but's were candy and nuts we would all have a merry christmas.
Why so mad?
You angry that Justin made even bigger fools of you rubes?
Do you honestly believe his story?
Calling a man a poacher is a serious accusation. Do you have any evidence to back this up?
BTW bigfoot has no hunting season,nor is a recognized protected species,so kinda hard to poach one.
Final question.....do you like to engage in online roleplay because your life is so crushingly dull?
Your right, anon 11:36, Justin failed the test. I do believe he shot something, A bear, where the BF story came from?? His story matches that of a true poacher, even his choice of weapons reeks non ethical poacher. I can't believe he is making money and considered anything other than a good for nothing poacher. I say nothing, I wouldn't say directly to his face. TC
DeleteAnon 11:40 His statement is the evidence. If you are an ethical law abiding hunter or a game officer, His statement makes an open and shut case. TC
DeleteNo 11:36... You silly little disinformationist, he passed a lie detector's test.
Delete"This is exactly what happened during the documentary about the Sykes study where Justin Smeja was interviewed about his claim to have shot and killed at least one bigfoot. It was well known within the community that Justin submitted a tissue sample to Sykes that was believed to be that of a bear. This was known information before hand. Yet when the documentary was released, it was edited to make it sound like Smeja claimed to have acquired the tissue sample directly from the bigfoot itself. This was not only misleading, it was an outright lie. Regardless of how you feel about Smeja, or what your opinion is on his claim, he was in fact misrepresented and lied about during this documentary. That is a fact."
- Matt K
11:40... The fool is he spending his time around something that so seemingly causes nothing but negativity in him. The only "role player" is you, trying to play the role of "confident sceptic"... When you're here, having to reinforce your level of child like, boogeyman reassurance. Rich someone like you should comment on anyone else's life.
TC, I don't mean to dissagree with you in any way disrespectfully, your opinion is always respected very highly on my part.
DeleteI'n not a skeptic, I tend to give everyone the benefit of a doubt. I believe he shot a bear, I believe the test, I believe the tears of absolute proof of fraud he cried. If he knew this was a set up, why did he allow himself to be part of it. If your heart tells you to believe Justin killed a BF, believe him. His statements let me and every law abiding hunter know, he's a poacher. I've never heard anything to the contrary about his hunting ethics, have you? That's my problem with Justin. Others can debate why anyone would kill anything and leave it laying. Poachers do that regularly. Hunters don't. TC
DeleteHe thing is TC, I am not residing in a country where hunting is a major part of my culture, I am naive to the sport and if I'm honest don't like the thought of shooting bears and mountain lion... But this is why I am not so offended with him allegedly poaching, ourely because I don't understand it all...
DeleteBut believe he is saying the truth, and it is the affiliation of people like Bart Cutino that has swayed me more than anything. Your opinion is respected, and even if he did do what he said he did, I find it appalling... But my gut feeling points to it being the truth. The one thing I don't like about it all is people posting deliverately wrong information, I understand I have as much a claim to the actual truth as anyone else.
So nothing prove he is a poacher.
DeleteExcept his statement. Which you believe when its convenient and dismiss when it is not.
Yep that is footery all right.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteIktomi, Even in disagreement, you treat me with nothing but respect my friend. I have and opinion of the man for which his statements make me confident. You have much more info about what he might have actually killed and what he has encountered with the skeptics. My problem is completely with the man's actions my friend. I wasn't there to see what he used a 25 caliber weapon while standing by a road after driving around searching for something to shoot at. That's my complete problem with my admitted unethical Justin. 0= NO problems at all with my well informed friend IKTOMI, your friend and supporter, TC
DeleteActually TC, your comment at 11:58 has helped me better understand the distinction betwrmine hunting and poaching, and I can very much see why you would be offended by that.
DeleteListen TC, I rely on good, honest people like yourself to educate me of your ways over there. Very, very often, when you post it is a complete education and you along with a select few of new comers have really made the blog a far better place.
DeleteThank you sir. You have a friend in me.
Anon 12:04, walk in to a Game officer or a sheriff's office, and admit, You were using a truck, to look for game on public hunting land. You shot anything from that truck or from the road, then you left your kill. You will be prosecuted based on your admission of guilt for several infractions. If you claim you killed a BF, what will happen? Plus you have no proof. The admitted act is the infraction, no matter what you say you killed. HIS BIG MOUTH and appearances story telling to the public and signing his statement, that's all that's needed to prosecute a poacher around here. Should be that way everywhere. TC
DeleteFood for thought TC., In this state, when your feet hit the ground, your OK.
DeleteSecond, Justin regularly hunted (heard thinning) for the local game authority. From what I remember, he was tagged up for bear, and the only issue was one side of the road or other ------
And finally, Dude, when you see something like like this -------- you short the hell out, you cannot say you would be rational until you've been exactly in his shoes.
It was far from Ideal and Justin has admitted it and feels bad, but he is also heard so much of the murder crap, he's like "aw screw it, I'll get another to shut people up!"
I just ask that you cut him a little slack, He knows it wasn't good. But again MONSTER!
But hey, your your own man too!
Hey Iktomi ----- did you read that Dan can Lick his own ass! ha ha ha
Iktomi, people trying to figure out the BF story aren't the problem my friend. I can't imagine why Justin hasn't been jerked in by his ears. We have a little wildlife officer around hear named Brent. He used this and a couple other stories to make the distinction between hearsay evidence and admitted evidence usable to prosecute. Here, Justin would have a much smaller bank account, and would be famous for a totally different reason. We have a healthy wildlife population, and a very serious view of those that disrespect it my friend. I can't say what he killed, but shooting at anything in that matter,even if he missed, is a serious offense IKTOMI. Your doing well as usual friend. TC
DeleteI see... That's a very interesting comment. I can't communicate to you enough how much I enjoy your comments, you understand instantly that you are exchanging with someone very experienced and very intelligent... I think anyone will agree.
DeleteTK! I did notice, ha ha ha!!
TC is right on. Sad how so many today lack respect and ethics.
DeleteHey Chick!!
DeleteTC, I saw something that could very well have been a BF, I had a Glc 40cal, loaded to the hilt and three extra clips. I didn't even attempt to get a shot. I've never heard of anyone using the excuse of, I freaked out, and getting a pass. What herd was he licensed and thinning? He said they were driving around looking for bear, then if you believe him, he thinned a BF herd. No excuse will work my friend. Licensed hunters are the only official herd thinners, if animal population become to high, the state allows higher bag limits, and extra long seasons. That's a blanket statement for everywhere TK. State don't loose the chance to make money on extra kill tags by allowing a few guys to go out and kill without discretion. Hunting provides huge amounts of monies to each state. I've never heard of any animals in a herd being individually thinned. We can all be misled from time to time. TC
DeleteHey Iktomi,TK, TC. I enjoyed reading the posts today- nice! Have a great friday all.
DeleteYou the Man IKTOMI, have a great one friend TC
DeleteWell TC, Itkomi, TK, Chick. There are some outstanding researchers that have been involved with Smeja that believe him and they have tried on numerous occassions to trip him up and spy on his conversations, to find out if he is lying. He had a bear tag so he was not poaching if he did shoot a bear. He did pass a lie detector test and it was reported here first back in 2012 I believe.
DeleteNow everything about the whole matter is reprehensible to me and if in fact he pulled the trigger on the adult and even worse the kid to me that is murder. Itkomi was absoulutely correct in that they new it was bear that was being tested, it had already been tested as bear at another US lab. Icon films had an agenda to try and make bigfooters look like fools. If he shot and left the young one another bigfoot family member would have taken the body for whatever ceremony they use.
Anyway that is my take, no better or worse than anyone elses in this messed up matter.
Chuck
I find just about everything about this reprehensible, and if indeed he shot an adult and killed a kid bigfoot, to me this is murder.
DeleteIktomi is correct he passed the lie detector in Oct. of 2012 I think and it was reported on a daily basis. He had a bear tag so he would not be poaching a bear. There are some really good and reputable researchers that have been involved with him that have tried hard to vet him and trip him up and even spy on his private conversations to find if he was lying. They believe him.
My whole opinion is it sucks and it sucks bad.
Chuck
Oh I forgot. Itkomi is also right about they new it was bear being tested. It had already been tested bear in a New York lab.
DeleteChuck
Chuck, my man, I two agree about all you said, except the test shown on tv, he failed that one. I'm convinced he shot something. I've seen these kinda people in action, his story makes sense from a poacher's kill anything that moves perspective. I despise that way of thinking. How does a person conceive of killing the young of any species? They did it or have done it in the recent past, that's how. I believe he destroyed something absolutely, and just the way he said, why not a huge creature bogged down with the responsibility of caring for young. Bear, BF, hell, cow and calf, dog with pups, whatever, killing for the love of killing is just that, I'm not concerned with what he shot, my concern is with the shooter being glorified of this terrible crime against nature. Tri-county.
DeleteDamn straight TC, he's a cowardly scoundrel. I don't care who decides to rub shoulders with him. I believe he killed a couple of bears, thought he was heard or discovered, and claimed bf. People that know a body is needed often use that fact as a reason for kill instead of video or research. He no hero of mine either.
DeletePassed the one on YouTube. Cutino had a bear result from several labs, I think too.
DeleteIf Smegma "thought" he was heard or discovered that he had poached some bears, why come out a few months later and claim Bigfoot? He would of been busted when he was coming down from said "site".Your thinking is ILLOGICAL 4:18.
DeleteIllogical.... In memory of William Shatner.
My bad, Leonard Nimoy.
@11:36 and others. I've learned not to trust some of the statements said here. He passed his questions. Here, paste the link and read for yourself.
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2012/08/justin-smejas-official-polygraph.html
6:16... He went straight on to a hunting forum as he was deeply troubled by hi actions in reflection, and posted that he had shot some "strange bears", or words to that effect. He was then coaxed by a well known researcher (I forget his name, sorry), for many weeks before he decided to go back to the kill site, to which time there were feet of snow on the ground and the dogs he took were trained to find bear.
DeleteNobody should listen to or support Riolo in ANY WAY. Not since he showed his true colors by siding with insane hoaxer Rick Dyer. Go to his youtube show and see for your self, it's sickening. I couldn't even make it through the first episode.
ReplyDelete..He is an entertainer and should be judged as such, not as a researcher....
DeleteThat's letting Rictor off too easy. Point is he has a LOUD voice in the community, be he an entertainer or not. And he gave a platform to one of the biggest cancer's the community has ever seen. And all that will do is encourage the cancer to keep coming back. So thanks Rictor, thanks a whole freaking lot Mr Entertainment. You've done no favors to anyone that actually tries to take this subject seriously with your Rick Dyer stunt show. Thanks a whole f-ing lot.
DeleteIf Rictor is going to call him self an "entertainer", that's just an excuse for his inability to do any real work regarding Sasquatch.
Deleteentertainer at a gay bar or a ru-paul knock off show! Entertainer is the biggest bullshit I have heard in a while. entertainer pfft! You joking right rictor? oh that's right maybe he's doing stand up in L.A. now too!
DeleteKilling females and babies is entertaining to some, I guess.
DeleteLOL at "Cancer in the bigfoot community"
DeleteYou idiot. EVERYTHING Bigfoot is made up. Dyer is the same as Patterson is the same as Meldrum is the same as everyone. IT'S ALL MADE UP.
^ True Dat.
DeleteNice to see you stopping by Mr Dyer
DeleteThe "lol" poster from 1:35 is just proving the point. It's impossible for the people who take this seriously to BE taken seriously, all because of stuff like that. Why are you even on a Bigfoot board?
Delete2:46 You know its ALL make believe. You just want certain people playing and others not. You want your play to be respectable and within the realm of the possible. However, you're lower in the "bigfoot community" than a hoaxer. Hoaxers are entertaining and created the whole industry.
DeleteBy the way..smegma not only shot from the road he did it at night..unless you are a tribal member that method is illegal as hell..and any outdoorsman with any honor or skill would never do...he's just a piece of garbage...also there's a reason lie detector tests aren't admissible in court
ReplyDeleteHe wasn't on a road persay but definitely from a vehicle.
DeleteKNOW IT ALL DICKHEAD. PERSAY!.^
DeleteTrailing shin rise looks human to me
ReplyDeleteDoes Bart still stand by Justin?
ReplyDeleteYou people are giving Rictor and Justin way too much power. You're not haters, you're their fans.
ReplyDelete